Gijs Brouwer vs Nathaniel Lammons Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
G. Brouwer vs N. Lammons

Gijs Brouwer

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

341

C. Rank

595

114

Best Rank

591

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$294.8K

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nathaniel Lammons

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

341

C. Rank

595

114

Best Rank

591

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$294.8K

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Brouwer 1 - 0 Lammons

They have played 2 sets in total, with Gijs Brouwer winning 2 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 0. The last match between Gijs Brouwer and Nathaniel Lammons was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 31-10-2021, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Gijs Brouwer getting the victory 6-0 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Brouwer	1
Lammons	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1) Charlottesville Challenger(10-31-21)

Stats

Gijs Brouwer

Nathaniel Lammons

G. Brouwer vs N. Lammons H2H Profile

G. Brouwer	Stats	N. Lammons
$294,840	Career Prize Money	$0
57.19% (330-247)	Career Total W/L	53.42% (78-68)
1	Indoor	0
6	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

G. Brouwer vs N. Lammons Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gijs Brouwer has won 54.55% of points on their second serve, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 65.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gijs Brouwer, in recent form, has won 35.29% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 45.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 7.14% and 26.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Gijs Brouwer has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nathaniel Lammons has saved 50.00% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Gijs Brouwer has won 25.00% of matches played (W/L 2/6), with Nathaniel Lammons winning 0% (W/L 0/1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Gijs Brouwer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 101/64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 83/71). Nathaniel Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Gijs Brouwer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/2), where as Nathaniel Lammons has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gijs Brouwer winning 1 times and Nathaniel Lammons being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gijs Brouwer winning 2 and Nathaniel Lammons winning 0.
The last match between Gijs Brouwer and Nathaniel Lammons was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 31-10-2021, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Gijs Brouwer getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:41:5.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gijs Brouwer has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.75 while Nathaniel Lammons has played against players with an average rank of 867.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gijs Brouwer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nathaniel Lammons has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Gijs Brouwer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nathaniel Lammons has converted 50.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Gijs Brouwer vs Nathaniel Lammons Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

G. Brouwer vs N. Lammons H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

G. Brouwer	Stats	N. Lammons
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	2
1	Aces (Total)	6
1	Total Double Faults	1
0:41:5	Average Match Time	0:41:5
78% (25/32)	1st Serve %	68% (30/44)
92% (23/25)	1st Serve Win %	43% (13/30)
71% (5/7)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (6/14)
71% (5/7)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/0)
57% (25/44)	Return Points Win %	13% (4/32)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

G. Brouwer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wimbledon - London - 30-06-2025
Q1 Yasutaka UchiyamaY. Uchiyama	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
French Open - Paris - 26-05-2025
Q1 Nikoloz BasilashviliN. Basilashvili	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
ABN AMRO Open - Rotterdam - 03-02-2025
Q3 Mattia BellucciM. Bellucci	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Q1 Max HoukesM. Houkes	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
Quimper Challenger - 20-01-2025
R1 Kyrian JacquetK. Jacquet	L	7-5 6-4	Stats

View All

N. Lammons Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Guangzhou Challenger - 08-09-2025
Q1 Tomohiro MasabayashiT. Masabayashi	L	5-7 7-5 1-2 ret.	Stats
Charlottesville Challenger - 01-11-2021
Q1 Gijs BrouwerG. Brouwer	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger - 04-10-2021
Q1 Mats RosenkranzM. Rosenkranz	L	6-4 4-6 7-6(4)	Stats
Szczecin Challenger - 13-09-2021
Q1 Nicola KuhnN. Kuhn	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Nottingham 1 Challenger - 07-06-2021
Q1 Borna GojoB. Gojo	L	7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4	Stats

View All

G. Brouwer vs N. Lammons Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

G. Brouwer	Stats	N. Lammons
57.19% (330/247)	YTD Win/Loss	53.42% (78/68)
56.22% (728/567)	Sets Win/Loss	55.46% (188/151)
52.84% (6476/5779)	Games Win/Loss	52.85% (1681/1500)
61.21% (101/64)	Hard Win/Loss	60.24% (50/33)
56.22% (113/88)	Clay Win/Loss	45.45% (10/12)
55.11% (97/79)	Indoor Hard W/L	45.00% (18/22)
54.29% (19/16)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
0.35	Aces Per Game	0.3
2114	Aces Total	463
0.24	Double Faults Per Game	0.15
1418	Total Double Faults	233
1:17:50	Average Match Time	1st Match
476.98	Average Opponent Rank	396.46
66% (22291/33938)	1st Serve %	60% (3350/5549)
70% (15583/22291)	1st Serve Win %	70% (2359/3350)
50% (5822/11647)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (1061/2199)
42% (1431/3421)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (162/401)
40% (13691/34532)	Return Points Win %	35% (1907/5473)
38.89% (7/11)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
53.85% (28/24)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
53.22% (91/80)	Challenger W/L	33.33% (13/26)
60.90% (204/131)	Futures W/L	60.75% (65/42)
57% (319/561)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (78/145)
60% (3/5)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/1)
43% (72/168)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (24/46)
50% (73/147)	Deciding Set Win %	35% (16/46)
89% (332/295)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (83/68)
11% (332/37)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (83/15)
14% (244/34)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (63/11)